Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Stacy Winters v. United States, 16-3902 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-3902 Visitors: 43
Filed: Jun. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3902 _ Stacy Winters lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant v. United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City _ Submitted: June 15, 2017 Filed: June 20, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Having received a certificate of appealability from the district court, federal p
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 16-3902
                         ___________________________

                                    Stacy Winters

                       lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner - Appellant

                                           v.

                             United States of America

                       lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent - Appellee
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City
                                   ____________

                             Submitted: June 15, 2017
                               Filed: June 20, 2017
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Having received a certificate of appealability from the district court, federal
prisoner Stacy Winters directly appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 28 U.S.C.

      1
       The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.
§ 2255 motion to vacate his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). His motion was
based on Johnson v. United States, 
135 S. Ct. 2551
(2015). After carefully reviewing
the record, as well as the parties’ arguments and suggestions on appeal, we affirm.
See United States v. Prickett, 
839 F.3d 697
(8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam), petition for
cert. filed (U.S. Dec. 28, 2016); see also 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer