Filed: Jul. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3583 _ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Thomas F. Brown, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville _ Submitted: June 28, 2017 Filed: July 12, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Thomas Brown appeals the district court’s1 denial of his petitio
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3583 _ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Thomas F. Brown, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville _ Submitted: June 28, 2017 Filed: July 12, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Thomas Brown appeals the district court’s1 denial of his petition..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-3583
___________________________
United States of America,
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
Thomas F. Brown,
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
____________
Submitted: June 28, 2017
Filed: July 12, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Thomas Brown appeals the district court’s1 denial of his petition for coram
nobis relief, in which he sought to vacate his 1995 conviction for manufacturing
marijuana and peyote. We agree with the district court that Brown could not relitigate
his argument that he is entitled to relief under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act
of 1993, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb et seq., which has been rejected by this court on direct
appeal and in numerous subsequent habeas and coram nobis proceedings. See United
States v. Camacho-Bordes,
94 F.3d 1168, 1173 (8th Cir. 1996) (coram nobis relief is
substantially equivalent to habeas relief, and abuse-of-writ principles apply to coram
nobis cases); Willis v. United States,
654 F.2d 23, 24 (8th Cir. 1981) (coram nobis
petitioner is not entitled to review of issues that were considered and resolved in 28
U.S.C. § 2255 motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the
petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable Erin L. Setser, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas.
-2-