Filed: Jul. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1634 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Kevin Herring lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: July 13, 2017 Filed: July 21, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kevin Herring appeals the district court’s1 order revoking his supervised releas
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1634 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Kevin Herring lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids _ Submitted: July 13, 2017 Filed: July 21, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kevin Herring appeals the district court’s1 order revoking his supervised release..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1634
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Kevin Herring
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids
____________
Submitted: July 13, 2017
Filed: July 21, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Kevin Herring appeals the district court’s1 order revoking his supervised
release and imposing a 10-month sentence. His counsel has moved for leave to
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, United States District Judge for the Northern
District of Iowa.
withdraw and has filed a brief questioning the reasonableness of Herring’s revocation
sentence.
Our review of the record satisfies us that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in sentencing Herring as it did. See United States v. Johnson,
827 F.3d
740, 744 (8th Cir. 2016) (appellate court reviews district court’s revocation sentence
under abuse-of-discretion standard).
The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
granted.
______________________________
-2-