Filed: Jul. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3918 _ Lydia M. Martin, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Arkansas Department of Health, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: July 7, 2017 Filed: July 25, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lydia M. Martin appeals district court1 orders dismissing some
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3918 _ Lydia M. Martin, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Arkansas Department of Health, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: July 7, 2017 Filed: July 25, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lydia M. Martin appeals district court1 orders dismissing some c..
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 16-3918 ___________________________ Lydia M. Martin, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Arkansas Department of Health, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee. ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock ____________ Submitted: July 7, 2017 Filed: July 25, 2017 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Lydia M. Martin appeals district court1 orders dismissing some claims for failure to state a claim, and granting summary judgment to defendant on her 1 The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. remaining claim, in her employment-discrimination action against the Arkansas Department of Health (ADH). After de novo review of the issues that Martin raises, as we understand them, we find no basis for overturning the entry of judgment in ADH’s favor. The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
