Filed: Jan. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2249 _ David Librace lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: January 16, 2018 Filed: January 24, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. David Librace appeals
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2249 _ David Librace lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: January 16, 2018 Filed: January 24, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. David Librace appeals ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2249
___________________________
David Librace
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
____________
Submitted: January 16, 2018
Filed: January 24, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
David Librace appeals from the order of the District Court1 affirming the denial
of disability insurance benefits. The only orders properly before this Court on appeal
are the orders granting the Commissioner’s motion for relief filed under Rule 60(a)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and denying Librace’s motion to alter or
amend filed under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. We conclude
that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in making those rulings. See Keller
v. City of Fremont,
719 F.3d 932, 946 (8th Cir. 2013) (reviewing the district court’s
ruling on a Rule 60(a) motion for an abuse of discretion); Sipp v. Astrue,
641 F.3d
975, 981 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing the district court’s ruling on a Rule 59(e) motion
for an abuse of discretion). We affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable
Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-