Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1697 _ Hector Morales-Tigu lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: February 6, 2018 Filed: February 13, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Hector Morales-Tigu petitions for review of an order
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1697 _ Hector Morales-Tigu lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: February 6, 2018 Filed: February 13, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Hector Morales-Tigu petitions for review of an order o..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1697
___________________________
Hector Morales-Tigu
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: February 6, 2018
Filed: February 13, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Hector Morales-Tigu petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the decision of an
immigration judge (IJ) denying his request for asylum and withholding of removal.1
We conclude that substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that
Morales-Tigu failed to show that the Guatemalan government is unable or unwilling
to control the private actors that he fears. This finding is dispositive of Morales-
Tigu’s asylum claim. See Gutierrez-Vidal v. Holder,
709 F.3d 728, 732–33 (8th Cir.
2013). Because Morales-Tigu did not satisfy asylum’s lower burden, his withholding
claim fails as well. See
id. at 733.
We deny the petition for review.
______________________________
1
The IJ’s denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture is not before
this Court. See Hernandez v. Holder,
760 F.3d 855, 863 (8th Cir. 2014) (noting that
arguments not raised in an opening brief are waived).
-2-