Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Manuel Ordaz-Flores v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, 17-1665 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-1665 Visitors: 20
Filed: Mar. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1665 _ Manuel Ordaz-Flores lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: February 20, 2018 Filed: March 5, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Manuel Ordaz-Flores, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 17-1665
                         ___________________________

                               Manuel Ordaz-Flores

                             lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                           v.

         Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of the United States

                            lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                    ____________

                       Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals
                                   ____________

                           Submitted: February 20, 2018
                              Filed: March 5, 2017
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Manuel Ordaz-Flores, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) decision
to deny his application for cancellation of removal on discretionary hardship grounds
under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). After careful review, we conclude that the IJ used the
proper standard in denying relief, and thus that Ordaz-Flores has not raised a
cognizable challenge to the decision below. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to
review the denial, see Gomez-Perez v. Holder, 
569 F.3d 370
, 372-73 (8th Cir. 2009),
and we dismiss the petition.
                        ______________________________




                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer