Filed: Mar. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1665 _ Manuel Ordaz-Flores lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: February 20, 2018 Filed: March 5, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Manuel Ordaz-Flores, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1665 _ Manuel Ordaz-Flores lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: February 20, 2018 Filed: March 5, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Manuel Ordaz-Flores, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1665
___________________________
Manuel Ordaz-Flores
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Jefferson B. Sessions, III, Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: February 20, 2018
Filed: March 5, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, KELLY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Manuel Ordaz-Flores, a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals upholding an immigration judge’s (IJ’s) decision
to deny his application for cancellation of removal on discretionary hardship grounds
under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). After careful review, we conclude that the IJ used the
proper standard in denying relief, and thus that Ordaz-Flores has not raised a
cognizable challenge to the decision below. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to
review the denial, see Gomez-Perez v. Holder,
569 F.3d 370, 372-73 (8th Cir. 2009),
and we dismiss the petition.
______________________________
-2-