Filed: Mar. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2304 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jakheeno Stewart lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: March 9, 2018 Filed: March 14, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jakheeno Stewart appeals from the sentence imposed by the District Cou
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2304 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Jakheeno Stewart lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: March 9, 2018 Filed: March 14, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jakheeno Stewart appeals from the sentence imposed by the District Cour..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2304
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Jakheeno Stewart
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: March 9, 2018
Filed: March 14, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Jakheeno Stewart appeals from the sentence imposed by the District Court1
after he pleaded guilty to a gun charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has
1
The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
submitted a brief under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), questioning the
reasonableness of Stewart’s sentence.
After review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an
unreasonable sentence. There was no indication that it overlooked a relevant 18
U.S.C. § 3553 factor or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant
factors. See Gall v. United States,
552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007) (standard of review). We
have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75 (1988),
and we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. We affirm the sentence and grant
counsel leave to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-