Filed: May 03, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1773 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Larry Reese lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: March 7, 2018 Filed: May 3, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, MURPHY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Larry D. Reese directly appeals the above-Guidelines-range sentence the district
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1773 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Larry Reese lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: March 7, 2018 Filed: May 3, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, MURPHY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Larry D. Reese directly appeals the above-Guidelines-range sentence the district ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1773
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Larry Reese
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: March 7, 2018
Filed: May 3, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, MURPHY, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Larry D. Reese directly appeals the above-Guidelines-range sentence the
district court1 imposed upon revoking his supervised release. Having jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
1
The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
In a brief filed under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1968), counsel has
moved for leave to withdraw, and asserts that the sentence is unreasonable because
the district court failed to take into account several mitigating factors.
This court concludes that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
sentencing Reese. See United States v. Miller,
557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009)
(standard of review); United States v. Perkins,
526 F.3d 1107, 1110-11 (8th Cir.
2008) (this court reviews entire sentencing record, not merely district court’s
statements at sentencing hearing).
The judgment is affirmed. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
______________________________
-2-