Filed: Jun. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3113 _ Raymond D. Elliott lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City _ Submitted: May 31, 2018 Filed: June 5, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Raymond Elliott appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judg
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3113 _ Raymond D. Elliott lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City _ Submitted: May 31, 2018 Filed: June 5, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Raymond Elliott appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgm..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-3113
___________________________
Raymond D. Elliott
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City
____________
Submitted: May 31, 2018
Filed: June 5, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Raymond Elliott appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his action seeking rescission of his home loan under the Truth in Lending
1
The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of South Dakota.
Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667f. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’
filings, see Peterson v. Kopp,
754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of summary
judgment is reviewed de novo; record is viewed in light most favorable to nonmoving
party), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
______________________________
-2-