Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Raymond D. Elliott v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C., 17-3113 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-3113 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jun. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3113 _ Raymond D. Elliott lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City _ Submitted: May 31, 2018 Filed: June 5, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Raymond Elliott appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judg
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 17-3113
                         ___________________________

                                 Raymond D. Elliott

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

                          Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C.

                        lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the District of South Dakota - Rapid City
                                   ____________

                             Submitted: May 31, 2018
                               Filed: June 5, 2018
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

     Raymond Elliott appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his action seeking rescission of his home loan under the Truth in Lending

      1
       The Honorable Jeffrey L. Viken, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of South Dakota.
Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667f. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’
filings, see Peterson v. Kopp, 
754 F.3d 594
, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (grant of summary
judgment is reviewed de novo; record is viewed in light most favorable to nonmoving
party), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s order. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
                        ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer