Filed: Jun. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1383 _ Brett McNeal lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. University of Minnesota Physicians lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: March 13, 2018 Filed: June 28, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Brett McNeal appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary jud
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1383 _ Brett McNeal lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. University of Minnesota Physicians lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis _ Submitted: March 13, 2018 Filed: June 28, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Brett McNeal appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary judg..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1383
___________________________
Brett McNeal
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
University of Minnesota Physicians
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
____________
Submitted: March 13, 2018
Filed: June 28, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Brett McNeal appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination and wrongful-discharge suit against his
1
The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
former employer, University of Minnesota Physicians. Having reviewed the record
and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err
in its decision. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) (“The court shall grant summary judgment
if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the
movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”); Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp.,
670 F.3d 844, 852-53 (8th Cir. 2012) (explaining that we review a grant of summary
judgment de novo, viewing all facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving
party). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-