Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Thomas Stone v. Richard Clark, 17-2810 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-2810 Visitors: 22
Filed: Jul. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2810 _ Thomas Lee Stone, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant, v. Richard Clark, Lieutenant, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff _ Submitted: July 9, 2018 Filed: July 11, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983,
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 17-2810
                         ___________________________

                                 Thomas Lee Stone,

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant,

                                            v.

            Richard Clark, Lieutenant, Maximum Security Unit, ADC,

                        lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee.
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
                                   ____________

                               Submitted: July 9, 2018
                                 Filed: July 11, 2018
                                    [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

      In this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Arkansas inmate Thomas Stone
appeals a decision of the district court1 dismissing his lawsuit without prejudice for

      1
       The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth
failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Upon de novo review, we agree with the
district court that Stone failed to fully exhaust administrative remedies before filing
suit. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Burns v. Eaton, 
752 F.3d 1136
, 1141 (8th Cir. 2014).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer