Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Kasib Bilal v. IDS Property Casualty Ins. Co., 17-3575 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 17-3575 Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3575 _ Kasib Tauheed Bilal lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company, (originally named as Progressive Home Owners & Auto Insurance Company) lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: September 24, 2018 Filed: October 16, 2
More
               United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eighth Circuit
                      ___________________________

                              No. 17-3575
                      ___________________________

                              Kasib Tauheed Bilal

                      lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                         v.

  IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company, (originally named as Progressive
                 Home Owners & Auto Insurance Company)

                     lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

                     Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance

                           lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant
                                  ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
               for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
                                ____________

                       Submitted: September 24, 2018
                          Filed: October 16, 2018
                                 [Published]
                              ____________

Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
      In this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Kasib Bilal appeals
following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment. Upon careful de
novo review, see Withers v. Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., 
636 F.3d 958
, 962 (8th Cir.
2011), we conclude that the district court did not err in granting summary judgment
and we find no other basis for reversal.

      Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer