Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ruth Richter v. Commissioner, Social Security, 18-1682 (2018)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 18-1682 Visitors: 36
Filed: Nov. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1682 _ Ruth Richter lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: October 30, 2018 Filed: November 5, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ruth Richter appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 18-1682
                        ___________________________

                                     Ruth Richter

                        lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

                  Commissioner, Social Security Administration

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                      for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                                 ____________

                           Submitted: October 30, 2018
                            Filed: November 5, 2018
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Ruth Richter appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting the Social
Security Administration Commissioner’s motion to dismiss her civil action arising

      1
      The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
from the 1999 termination of her supplemental security income. We have thoroughly
reviewed the record and find no error warranting reversal. See Jenkins v. Kansas City
Mo. Sch. Dist., 
516 F.3d 1074
, 1080 (8th Cir. 2008) (“We review issues of subject
matter jurisdiction de novo.”). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R.
47B. We deny as moot the Commissioner’s pending motion to dismiss.
                        ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer