Filed: Dec. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1107 _ Latanya D. Blevins lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. AT&T Services, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: November 7, 2018 Filed: December 6, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this employment discrimination action brought under the Americans with D
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1107 _ Latanya D. Blevins lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. AT&T Services, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: November 7, 2018 Filed: December 6, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this employment discrimination action brought under the Americans with Di..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1107
___________________________
Latanya D. Blevins
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
AT&T Services, Inc.
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: November 7, 2018
Filed: December 6, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
In this employment discrimination action brought under the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), Latanya D. Blevins appeals from the order of the District
Court1 granting summary judgment to AT&T Services, Inc. After de novo review,
we conclude that the undisputed facts show that Blevins was not qualified to perform
the essential functions of her job, with or without reasonable accommodation, and
thus was not a qualified individual under the ADA. See Peterson v. Kopp,
754 F.3d
594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard of review); Tusing v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty.
Sch. Dist.,
639 F.3d 507, 518 (8th Cir. 2011) (listing the elements of a prima facie
case under the ADA). We affirm the judgment.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
-2-