Filed: Feb. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3707 _ Danis Flaudia Reyes lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: February 4, 2019 Filed: February 7, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Danis Flaudia Reyes petitions for review of
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-3707 _ Danis Flaudia Reyes lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States of America lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: February 4, 2019 Filed: February 7, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Danis Flaudia Reyes petitions for review of ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-3707
___________________________
Danis Flaudia Reyes
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of the United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: February 4, 2019
Filed: February 7, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Danis Flaudia Reyes petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to reopen her removal
proceedings.
After careful review, we conclude that the BIA’s denial was not an abuse of its
discretion. See Khrystotodorov v. Mukasey,
551 F.3d 775, 785 (8th Cir. 2008)
(standard of review); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (“A motion to reopen proceedings shall
not be granted unless it appears to the Board that evidence sought to be offered is
material and was not available and could not have been discovered or presented at the
former hearing . . . .”). We deny the petition.
______________________________
-2-