United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 18-2410
                         ___________________________

                                    Cynthia Jackson

                         lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                            v.

          Target Corporation; Does, John Does 1 - 10 and XYZ Corporation

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                       ____________

                      Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
                                   ____________

                           Submitted: February 26, 2019
                              Filed: March 1, 2019
                                  [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.
                       ____________

PER CURIAM.

      In this diversity action, Arkansas resident Cynthia Jackson appeals the district
court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on her negligence claim. After careful

      1
       The Honorable James M. Moody Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons
stated by the district court. See W. Heritage Ins. Co. v. Asphalt Wizards, 

, 836-37 (8th Cir. 2015) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo); see also
Harvey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 

, 971 (8th Cir. 1994) (discussing the
showing required in slip-and-fall cases under Arkansas law). Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




                                        -2-