Filed: Mar. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1643 _ Artemio Abelardo Alvarez-Ortiz lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Homeland Security _ Submitted: February 20, 2019 Filed: March 11, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Artemio Abelardo Alvarez-Ortiz petitions for review of an order, issued by
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1643 _ Artemio Abelardo Alvarez-Ortiz lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Homeland Security _ Submitted: February 20, 2019 Filed: March 11, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Artemio Abelardo Alvarez-Ortiz petitions for review of an order, issued by ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1643
___________________________
Artemio Abelardo Alvarez-Ortiz
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Department of Homeland Security
____________
Submitted: February 20, 2019
Filed: March 11, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Artemio Abelardo Alvarez-Ortiz petitions for review of an order, issued by the
Department of Homeland Security, reinstating a prior removal order against him.
Having jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. ยง 1252, and upon careful consideration, this court
finds no basis for reversal. See Perez-Garcia v. Lynch,
829 F.3d 937, 940-41 (8th
Cir. 2016) (decision to reinstate removal order is reviewed for substantial evidence,
and administrative factual findings will not be overturned unless a reasonable
adjudicator would be compelled to come to a contrary conclusion; due process
violation requires showing of actual prejudice).
The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-