United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 18-3209
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                         lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

                                            v.

                           Maria Esther Carrillo-Varelas

                       lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                      Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
                                  ____________

                              Submitted: June 27, 2019
                                Filed: July 1, 2019
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before KELLY, BOWMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Maria Esther Carrillo-Varelas directly appeals after she pled guilty to a drug-
trafficking offense, and the district court1 sentenced her to a prison term below the

      1
      The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Arkansas.
calculated United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”)
range. Her counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 

(1967),
challenging the district court’s application of two Guidelines enhancements, one for
maintaining a premises for the purpose of distributing a controlled substance, and the
other for possessing a dangerous weapon during a drug-trafficking offense.

      After careful review of the record, we conclude that the enhancements were
properly applied, as they were not based on clearly erroneous findings. See United
States v. Miller, 

, 705 (8th Cir. 2012) (noting whether the defendant
maintained a premises for the purpose of distributing a controlled substance is a
factual finding reviewed for clear error); United States v. Atkins, 

, 1213
(8th Cir. 2001) (noting whether the defendant possessed a firearm during a
drug-trafficking offense is a factual finding reviewed for clear error). We have also
independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 

(1988), and
have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm.
                       ______________________________




                                         -2-