Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Bradley Turner, 19-1824 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 19-1824 Visitors: 37
Filed: Sep. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1824 _ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee, v. Bradley E. Turner, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport _ Submitted: September 4, 2019 Filed: September 9, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Bradley Turner appeals after the district court1 revoked his supe
More
              United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eighth Circuit
                    ___________________________

                            No. 19-1824
                    ___________________________

                         United States of America,

                    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

                                       v.

                             Bradley E. Turner,

                  lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.
                                   ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
                              ____________

                      Submitted: September 4, 2019
                        Filed: September 9, 2019
                              [Unpublished]
                             ____________

Before COLLOTON, ERICKSON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________
PER CURIAM.

       Bradley Turner appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release
and sentenced him within the calculated Guidelines range. His counsel has filed a
brief challenging the reasonableness of the sentence and seeking to withdraw.

        We conclude that the district court imposed a substantively reasonable
revocation sentence, as there is no indication that the court overlooked a relevant
factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a
clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v.
McGhee, 
869 F.3d 703
, 705 (8th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (substantive reasonableness
of revocation sentence is reviewed under same abuse-of-discretion standard applied
to initial sentencing decisions); United States v. Feemster, 
572 F.3d 455
, 461–62 (8th
Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing substantive reasonableness). Accordingly, we affirm
the judgment, and we grant counsel permission to withdraw.
                        ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer