Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Scott Seldin v. Theodore Seldin, 18-3679 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 18-3679 Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-3679 _ Scott A. Seldin lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant Derry Seldin; Traci Seldin Moser lllllllllllllllllllllIntervenor Plaintiffs v. Theodore M. Seldin; Stanley C. Silverman; Mark Schlossberg lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: August 22, 2019 Filed: September 20, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Cir
More
              United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 18-3679
                     ___________________________

                               Scott A. Seldin

                    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                     Derry Seldin; Traci Seldin Moser

                    lllllllllllllllllllllIntervenor Plaintiffs

                                       v.

        Theodore M. Seldin; Stanley C. Silverman; Mark Schlossberg

                   lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                    ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
                   for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                               ____________

                        Submitted: August 22, 2019
                         Filed: September 20, 2019
                               [Unpublished]
                               ____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Scott Seldin appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his diversity action
seeking an accounting of a family trust. Having carefully reviewed the record and the
parties’ arguments on appeal, see Abdurrahman v. Dayton, 
903 F.3d 813
, 816 (8th
Cir. 2018) (de novo review of mootness dismissal), we find no basis for reversal.

      The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                     ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the
District of Nebraska.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer