Filed: Oct. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-3095 _ Wendy Alison Nora lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant v. Internal Revenue Service lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota _ Submitted: October 15, 2019 Filed: October 29, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Wendy Nora appeals the district court’s1 denial of her third motion for an extension of time, and dismissal o
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-3095 _ Wendy Alison Nora lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant v. Internal Revenue Service lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota _ Submitted: October 15, 2019 Filed: October 29, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Wendy Nora appeals the district court’s1 denial of her third motion for an extension of time, and dismissal of..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-3095
___________________________
Wendy Alison Nora
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellant
v.
Internal Revenue Service
lllllllllllllllllllllAppellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Minnesota
____________
Submitted: October 15, 2019
Filed: October 29, 2019
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Wendy Nora appeals the district court’s1 denial of her third motion for an
extension of time, and dismissal of her bankruptcy appeal for failure to comply with
1
The Honorable Wilhelmina M. Wright, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
a court-ordered deadline. Following a careful review, we conclude that the district
court did not abuse its discretion by denying the extension and dismissing the appeal.
See Smith v. Gold Dust Casino,
536 F.3d 402, 404 (8th Cir. 2008) (dismissal for
failure to prosecute or failure to comply with court order is reviewed for abuse of
discretion); In re Harlow Fay, Inc.,
993 F.2d 1351, 1352-53 (8th Cir. 1993) (district
court’s denial of request for extension of filing deadline in a bankruptcy appeal is
reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We
also deny Nora’s appellate motion as moot.
______________________________
-2-