Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

85-1833 (1986)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 85-1833 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 07, 1986
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 780 F.2d 720 Glen WALKER and Benford Walker, Next Friend of Florence Walker, deceased and Estate of Florence Walker, Appellants, v. STATE OF IOWA, Judicial Department of State of Iowa, including Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and Polk County District Court; W.W. Reynoldson, Chief Justice; Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General; Valley National Bank and Trust Co., Administrator of the Estate of Florence Walker and its attorney, Bernard O'Malley, Appellees. No. 85-1833. United States Court of Appeals
More

780 F.2d 720

Glen WALKER and Benford Walker, Next Friend of Florence
Walker, deceased and Estate of Florence Walker, Appellants,
v.
STATE OF IOWA, Judicial Department of State of Iowa,
including Supreme Court, Court of Appeals and Polk County
District Court; W.W. Reynoldson, Chief Justice; Thomas J.
Miller, Attorney General; Valley National Bank and Trust
Co., Administrator of the Estate of Florence Walker and its
attorney, Bernard O'Malley, Appellees.

No. 85-1833.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 4, 1985.
Decided Jan. 7, 1986.

Walker, et al., pro se.

Bernard O'Malley, Des Moines, Iowa, for Valley Nat. Bank.

Brent Appel, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State of Iowa.

Before HEANEY, BOWMAN, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Glen and Benford Walker appeal pro se from the district court's dismissal of their civil rights suit for failure to state a claim. They allege that they and their deceased mother, Florence Walker, were deprived of due process of law in state court proceedings concerning the conservatorship of Florence Walker and probate of her will. They also contend that the twenty-first amendment to the Iowa Constitution violates the Federal Constitution because it denies them the right to vote for state judges.

2

We have carefully reviewed the record and we find appellant's arguments frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. See 8th Cir.R. 12(a).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer