Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Rebolledo-Adan v. Holder, 06-70391 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 06-70391 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 30, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DEC 30 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FRANCISCO REBOLLEDO-ADAN, No. 06-70391 Petitioner, Agency No. A070-728-191 v. MEMORANDUM * ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted December 15, 2009 ** Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Francisco Rebolledo-Adan, a native and citizen of Mexico, peti
More
                              NOT FOR PUBLICATION

                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                       FILED
                              FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT                         DEC 30 2009

                                                                        MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
                                                                         U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

 FRANCISCO REBOLLEDO-ADAN,                        No. 06-70391

               Petitioner,                        Agency No. A070-728-191

   v.
                                                  MEMORANDUM *
 ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

               Respondent.



                       On Petition for Review of an Order of the
                           Board of Immigration Appeals

                             Submitted December 15, 2009 **

Before:        GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

        Francisco Rebolledo-Adan, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of



          *
             This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
          **
             The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JT/Research
discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Morales Apolinar v. Mukasey, 
514 F.3d 893
, 895 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.

        The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Rebolledo-Adan’s motion to

reconsider because the motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the

BIA’s October 6, 2005, order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(1).

        PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.




JT/Research                               2                                    06-70391

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer