Filed: Jul. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 15, 2016 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 16-2059 KEVIN FOLSE, (D.C. Nos . 1:16-CV-00196-JB/WPL and 1:15-CR-02485-JB-1) Defendant - Appellant. (D.N.M.) ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APEALABILITY * Before GORSUCH, BALDOCK, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. Defendant Folse stands convicted of federal offenses related to carjacking and gun possessi
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 15, 2016 Elisabeth A. Shumaker TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 16-2059 KEVIN FOLSE, (D.C. Nos . 1:16-CV-00196-JB/WPL and 1:15-CR-02485-JB-1) Defendant - Appellant. (D.N.M.) ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APEALABILITY * Before GORSUCH, BALDOCK, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges. Defendant Folse stands convicted of federal offenses related to carjacking and gun possessio..
More
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
Tenth Circuit
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS July 15, 2016
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
TENTH CIRCUIT
Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. No. 16-2059
KEVIN FOLSE, (D.C. Nos . 1:16-CV-00196-JB/WPL
and 1:15-CR-02485-JB-1)
Defendant - Appellant. (D.N.M.)
ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APEALABILITY *
Before GORSUCH, BALDOCK, and McHUGH, Circuit Judges.
Defendant Folse stands convicted of federal offenses related to carjacking and
gun possession. His sentencing hearing is currently scheduled for July 19, 2016. In
an order dated March 31, 2016, the district court explained to Defendant Folse why
his § 2255 petition was premature and dismissed his petition without prejudice. For
the reasons stated in that court’s order, Defendant’s appeal from the dismissal
thereof is similarly premature. Accordingly, we deny Defendant a certificate of
appealability, deny any outstanding motions as moot, and dismiss the appeal.
*
This order is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the
case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its
persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
Entered for the Court,
Bobby R. Baldock
United States Circuit Judge
2