Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Richardson, 17-1002 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 17-1002 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT March 9, 2017 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. No. 17-1002 (D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV-01416-WJM and DERRICK DESEAN RICHARDSON, 1:13-CR-00353-WJM-1) (D. Colo.) Defendant - Appellant. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _ Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges. _ This matter is before us on the appellee’s Motion for Summary Affirmance (the “Mo
More
                                                                                    FILED
                                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                      UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS                            Tenth Circuit

                             FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT                             March 9, 2017
                         _________________________________
                                                                            Elisabeth A. Shumaker
                                                                                Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

      Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.                                                           No. 17-1002
                                                 (D.C. Nos. 1:16-CV-01416-WJM and
DERRICK DESEAN RICHARDSON,                             1:13-CR-00353-WJM-1)
                                                              (D. Colo.)
      Defendant - Appellant.
                      _________________________________

                             ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
                         _________________________________

Before MATHESON, BACHARACH, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
                  _________________________________

       This matter is before us on the appellee’s Motion for Summary Affirmance (the

“Motion”). The United States moves for summary affirmance of the district court’s order

and separate judgment denying relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in light of the Supreme

Court’s decision in Beckles v. United States, __S. Ct.__, 
2017 WL 855781
(March 6,

2017). The appellant Derrick Desean Richardson does not oppose the Motion.

       Upon consideration, the Motion is granted. The judgment of the district court is

affirmed.




       *
         This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its
persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.


                                     Entered for the Court
                                     Per Curiam




                                     2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer