Filed: Sep. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 14 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SUNEARTH, INC., a California No. 13-17622 corporation; THE SOLARAY CORPORATION, a Hawaiian D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04991-CW corporation, Northern District of California, Oakland Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ORDER SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO., LTD., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSOLAR USA INC., a California corporation, Defendant
Summary: FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 14 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SUNEARTH, INC., a California No. 13-17622 corporation; THE SOLARAY CORPORATION, a Hawaiian D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04991-CW corporation, Northern District of California, Oakland Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ORDER SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO., LTD., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSOLAR USA INC., a California corporation, Defendants..
More
FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 14 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS SUNEARTH, INC., a California No. 13-17622 corporation; THE SOLARAY CORPORATION, a Hawaiian D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04991-CW corporation, Northern District of California, Oakland Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ORDER SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO., LTD., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSOLAR USA INC., a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees. SUNEARTH, INC., a California No. 15-16096 corporation; THE SOLARAY CORPORATION, a Hawaiian D.C. No. 4:11-cv-04991-CW corporation, Northern District of California, Oakland Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUN EARTH SOLAR POWER CO., LTD., FKA Ningbo Solar Electric Power Co., Ltd., a Chinese limited liability company; NBSOLAR USA INC., a California corporation, Defendants-Appellees. THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 2
