Filed: Nov. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 23 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GEORGE C. CHATMAN, No. 14-56794 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:14-cv-01244-PA-MAN v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 16, 2016** Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Geo
Summary: FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 23 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GEORGE C. CHATMAN, No. 14-56794 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:14-cv-01244-PA-MAN v. MEMORANDUM* UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding Submitted November 16, 2016** Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. Geor..
More
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 23 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
GEORGE C. CHATMAN, No. 14-56794
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 5:14-cv-01244-PA-MAN
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 16, 2016**
Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
George C. Chatman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights and
committed various torts against him by instructing him to file tax returns for the
years 2010, 2011, and 2012. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
affirm.
Chatman failed to address any of the district court’s grounds for dismissal,
and has therefore waived his appeal of the district court’s order. See Indep. Towers
of Wash. v. Washington,
350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not
consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”);
Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle,
7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by
argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).
AFFIRMED.
2 14-56794