Enrique Godoy v. Marion Spearman, 13-56024 (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Number: 13-56024
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED FOR PUBLICATION MAR 2 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ENRIQUE ANTHONY GODOY, No. 13-56024 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-07927-R-AGR v. Central District of California, Los Angeles MARION SPEARMAN, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit
Summary: FILED FOR PUBLICATION MAR 2 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ENRIQUE ANTHONY GODOY, No. 13-56024 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-07927-R-AGR v. Central District of California, Los Angeles MARION SPEARMAN, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit R..
More
FILED FOR PUBLICATION MAR 2 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ENRIQUE ANTHONY GODOY, No. 13-56024 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:10-cv-07927-R-AGR v. Central District of California, Los Angeles MARION SPEARMAN, Respondent-Appellee. ORDER THOMAS, Chief Judge: Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Graber did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Source: CourtListener
