Filed: Jul. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT July 31, 2018 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court MARY ANNE SAUSE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. No. 16-3231 (D.C. No. 2:15-CV-09633-JAR-TJJ) TIMOTHY J. BAUER, Chief of Police; (D. Kan.) JASON LINDSEY, Police Officer of Louisburg, Kansas; BRENT BALL, Police Officer of Louisburg, Kansas; RON ANDERSON, Former Chief of Police of Louisburg, Kansas; LEE STEVENS, Former Louisburg, Kansas Police Offic
Summary: FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT July 31, 2018 _ Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court MARY ANNE SAUSE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. No. 16-3231 (D.C. No. 2:15-CV-09633-JAR-TJJ) TIMOTHY J. BAUER, Chief of Police; (D. Kan.) JASON LINDSEY, Police Officer of Louisburg, Kansas; BRENT BALL, Police Officer of Louisburg, Kansas; RON ANDERSON, Former Chief of Police of Louisburg, Kansas; LEE STEVENS, Former Louisburg, Kansas Police Office..
More
FILED
United States Court of Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT July 31, 2018
_________________________________
Elisabeth A. Shumaker
Clerk of Court
MARY ANNE SAUSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. No. 16-3231
(D.C. No. 2:15-CV-09633-JAR-TJJ)
TIMOTHY J. BAUER, Chief of Police; (D. Kan.)
JASON LINDSEY, Police Officer of
Louisburg, Kansas; BRENT BALL, Police
Officer of Louisburg, Kansas; RON
ANDERSON, Former Chief of Police of
Louisburg, Kansas; LEE STEVENS,
Former Louisburg, Kansas Police Officer;
MARTY SOUTHARD, Mayor of City of
Louisburg, Kansas; TRAVIS
THOMPSON, Former Mayor of City of
Louisburg, Kansas,
Defendants - Appellees.
_________________________________
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
_________________________________
Before TYMKOVICH, Chief Judge, LUCERO and MORITZ, Circuit Judges.
_________________________________
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sause v. Bauer, No. 17-742,
2018 WL
3148262 (U.S. June 28, 2018), we remand to the district court with instructions to
(1) vacate its order dismissing Sause’s complaint and (2) conduct further proceedings
*
This order and judgment isn’t binding precedent, except under the doctrines of
law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. But it may be cited for its persuasive
value. See Fed. R. App. P. 32.1; 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate
forthwith.
Entered for the Court
Nancy L. Moritz
Circuit Judge