Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

88-2982 (1990)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 88-2982 Visitors: 39
Filed: Mar. 22, 1990
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 892 F.2d 850 21 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1405, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,090 In re ROBINSON BROTHERS DRILLING, INC., and Robinson Brothers Drilling Company, Debtors. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER LEASING CORP.; Halliburton Company; Gray Tool Company; and Ponder Fishing Tools, Inc., Defendants-Appellants, v. Harold G. LOWREY, Chapter 11 Trustee, for the Estate of the Debtors, Plaintiff-Appellee. No. 88-2982. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. Nov. 9, 1989. Rehearing Denied March 22, 1990. Theodore Gewe
More

892 F.2d 850

21 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1405, Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,090
In re ROBINSON BROTHERS DRILLING, INC., and Robinson
Brothers Drilling Company, Debtors.
MANUFACTURERS HANOVER LEASING CORP.; Halliburton Company;
Gray Tool Company; and Ponder Fishing Tools,
Inc., Defendants-Appellants,
v.
Harold G. LOWREY, Chapter 11 Trustee, for the Estate of the
Debtors, Plaintiff-Appellee.

No. 88-2982.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 9, 1989.
Rehearing Denied March 22, 1990.

Theodore Gewertz (Lawrence P. King, of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York City; James Vogt, Norman E. Reynolds, and V. Burns Hargis, of Reynolds, Ridings & Hargis, Oklahoma City, Okl., Richard Gerard, of Mfrs. Hanover Leasing Corp., New York City, Robert N. Sheets, of Phillips, McFall, McVay, Sheets, Juras & Lovelace, Doneen Douglas Jones, of Fellers, Snider, Blankenship, Bailey & Tippens, and Bruce Kerr, of Mahaffey & Gore, Oklahoma City, Okl., with him on the brief), of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York City, for defendants-appellants.

Gary L. Morrissey of Kenan & Peterson, Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff-appellee.

John J. Gill, General Counsel, and Michael F. Crotty, Associate General Counsel, of the American Bankers Ass'n, Washington, D.C., amicus curiae.

Before TACHA, BARRETT, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We affirm the judgment of the district court below and adopt its opinion, which is published at 97 B.R. 77.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer