Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mark B. Zuckert v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 91-2036 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 91-2036 Visitors: 56
Filed: Jul. 05, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 937 F.2d 617 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Tenth Circuit Rule 36.3 states that unpublished opinions and orders and judgments have no precedential value and shall not be cited except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark B. ZUCKERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-2036. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. July 5, 1991. Before STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, TACHA and
More

937 F.2d 617

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Tenth Circuit Rule 36.3 states that unpublished opinions and orders and judgments have no precedential value and shall not be cited except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Mark B. ZUCKERT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-2036.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

July 5, 1991.

Before STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, TACHA and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

The claimant Mark B. Zuckert appeals the Secretary's denial of his application for supplemental security income which was affirmed by the district court for the District of New Mexico. We AFFIRM the district court for substantially the reasons stated by the district court. Zuckert v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., Memorandum Opinion and Order, No. 89-481-JP (D.N.M. Jan. 22, 1991).

3

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer