Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

90-1215 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 90-1215 Visitors: 20
Filed: Oct. 04, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 945 F.2d 412 70 Ed. Law Rep. 35 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Marie E. WIRSING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF
More

945 F.2d 412

70 Ed. Law Rep. 35

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Marie E. WIRSING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOARD OF REGENTS OF the UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO and Each of
Its Members, Kathleen Arnold, Richard Bernick, Robert
Caldwell, Peter Dietze, Lynn Ellins, Harvey Phelps, Norwood
Robb, Roy Shore, and David Winn, William Grady, Dean of the
School of Education, University of Colorado at Denver, John
Buechner, Chancellor of the University of Colorado at
Denver, and E. Gordon Gee, President of the University of
Colorado, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 90-1215.

United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.

Oct. 4, 1991.

Before LOGAN and SEYMOUR, Circuit Judges, and WINDER,* District Judge.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT**

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

1

Marie E. Wirsing appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Board of Regents of the University of Colorado. We have fully considered Ms. Wirsing's contentions, and we are not persuaded the district court erred.

2

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable David K. Winder, District Judge, United States District Court for the District of Utah, sitting by designation

**

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer