Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Robert H. Ketchum, in Propria Persona v. Colorado State Hospital, Named As: Superintendent of Colorado State Hospital Ibsen Birgers, Burgis (Sic), 91-1202 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 91-1202 Visitors: 71
Filed: Oct. 21, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 947 F.2d 953 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Robert H. KETCHUM, in propria persona, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLORADO STATE HOS
More

947 F.2d 953

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Robert H. KETCHUM, in propria persona, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
COLORADO STATE HOSPITAL, named as: Superintendent of
Colorado State Hospital; Ibsen Birgers, Burgis
(sic), Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-1202.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Oct. 21, 1991.

Before McKAY, Chief Judge, and SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

We affirm for substantially the reasons given by the district court in its order below. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer