Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Earl S. Black v. Frank O. Gunter, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, 92-1165 (1993)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 92-1165 Visitors: 39
Filed: May 18, 1993
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 996 F.2d 310 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order. Earl S. BLACK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Frank O. GUNTER, Executive Director, Colo
More

996 F.2d 310

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Earl S. BLACK, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Frank O. GUNTER, Executive Director, Colorado Department of
Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 92-1165.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

May 18, 1993.

Before SEYMOUR, RONEY,* and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT**

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

1

The only issue presented by this appeal is whether its outcome is dictated by Lustgarden v. Gunter, 966 F.2d 552 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 624 (1992). Although, the two cases are factually and legally identical, petitioner attempts to distinguish them. We are unpersuaded by those attempts and consequently hold we are bound by Lustgarden. United States v. Cooper, 956 F.2d 960, 961 (10th Cir.1992) (one panel of this court cannot overrule the prior holding of another panel).

2

AFFIRMED.

*

The Honorable Paul H. Roney, Senior Circuit Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, sitting by designation

**

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer