Filed: Nov. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: While we do not order new post-trial, processing, we do order a corrected court-martial order to include all charges and specifications upon which the, accused was arraigned, to include the language of the reprimand, and to correct that the sentence was adjudged by, officer members.2 ACM S32191
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
UNITED STATES
v.
Senior Airman KEVIN M. DAVIS
United States Air Force
ACM S32191
26 November 2014
Sentence adjudged 1 August 2013 by SPCM convened at Kadena Air Base,
Okinawa, Japan. Military Judge: Gregory O. Friedland and Mark L.
Allred.
Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, reduction to E-1, and a
reprimand.
Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Captain Thomas A. Smith.
Appellate Counsel for the United States: Major Daniel J. Breen and Gerald
R. Bruce, Esquire.
Before
MITCHELL, WEBER, and CONTOVEROS
Appellate Military Judges
This opinion is subject to editorial correction before final release.
PER CURIAM:
The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error
materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Article 66(c),
UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000).
The Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation erroneously includes that the maximum sentence in this special
court-martial included total forfeiture of all pay and allowances. We conclude there is no colorable showing of
prejudice. See United States v. Green,
44 M.J. 93, 95 (C.A.A.F. 1996). While we do not order new post-trial
processing, we do order a corrected court-martial order to include all charges and specifications upon which the
accused was arraigned, to include the language of the reprimand, and to correct that the sentence was adjudged by
officer members. Rule for Courts-Martial 1114.
Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
FOR THE COURT
STEVEN LUCAS
Clerk of the Court
2 ACM S32191
