Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. FLOWERS, 3:16-cr-00058-SLG. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Alaska Number: infdco20161102725 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE DEFENSE MOTION TO SUPPRESS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FROM SEARCH OF RESIDENCE SHARON L. GLEASON , District Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence from Search of Residence at Docket 58. The motion has been fully briefed; 1 Magistrate Judge Oravec heard oral argument on the motion on August 23, 2016. A Report and Recommendation on the motion was issued by the Magistrate Judge at Docket 143. Defendant Wesley Flowers filed objections to the report in Cas
More

ORDER RE DEFENSE MOTION TO SUPPRESS PHYSICAL EVIDENCE FROM SEARCH OF RESIDENCE

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence from Search of Residence at Docket 58. The motion has been fully briefed;1 Magistrate Judge Oravec heard oral argument on the motion on August 23, 2016. A Report and Recommendation on the motion was issued by the Magistrate Judge at Docket 143. Defendant Wesley Flowers filed objections to the report in Case No. 3:16-cr-00035-SLG only.

For the same reasons that the Court articulated at Docket 190 in Case No. 3:16-cr-00035, the Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in its entirety and the Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence from Search of Residence at Docket 58 is DENIED.

FootNotes


1. Docket 82(Gov. Opp'n to Def. Mot.); Docket 98 (Def. Reply).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer