WALKER v. CAPSTONE BUILDING CORP., 96 So.3d 102 (2012)
Court: Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Number: inalco20120504001
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 04, 2012
Latest Update: May 04, 2012
Summary: THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. On March 26, 2010, this court reversed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Capstone Building Corporation insofar as it concluded that William Walker's wantonness claim is barred by a two-year statute of limitations. The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed the judgment of this court. Ex parte Capstone Building Corp., [Ms. 1090966, March 16, 2012] 96 So.3d 77 (Ala.2012). On remand, and in compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion, the judgment of the tri
Summary: THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. On March 26, 2010, this court reversed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Capstone Building Corporation insofar as it concluded that William Walker's wantonness claim is barred by a two-year statute of limitations. The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed the judgment of this court. Ex parte Capstone Building Corp., [Ms. 1090966, March 16, 2012] 96 So.3d 77 (Ala.2012). On remand, and in compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion, the judgment of the tria..
More
THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.
On March 26, 2010, this court reversed the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Capstone Building Corporation insofar as it concluded that William Walker's wantonness claim is barred by a two-year statute of limitations. The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed the judgment of this court. Ex parte Capstone Building Corp., [Ms. 1090966, March 16, 2012] 96 So.3d 77 (Ala.2012). On remand, and in compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
PITTMAN, BRYAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.
Source: Leagle
