Elawyers Elawyers

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. BAGGETT, 108 So.3d 1009 (2012)

Court: Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama Number: inalco20121026001 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2012
Summary: After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court THOMPSON, Presiding Judge. This court, on February 4, 2011, affirmed the trial court's judgment, without an opinion. 97 So.3d 816 (Ala.Civ.App. 2011) (table). This court's judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., [Ms. 1100578, September 21, 2012] 108 So.3d 1008 (Ala.2012). In compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reve
More

After Remand from the Alabama Supreme Court

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

This court, on February 4, 2011, affirmed the trial court's judgment, without an opinion. 97 So.3d 816 (Ala.Civ.App. 2011) (table). This court's judgment has been reversed and the cause remanded by the Supreme Court of Alabama. Ex parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., [Ms. 1100578, September 21, 2012] 108 So.3d 1008 (Ala.2012). In compliance with the Supreme Court's opinion, the judgment of the trial court is reversed for that court to order Baggett to reimburse State Farm in the amount of $25,000.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

PITTMAN, BRYAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer