U.S. v. JONES, 1:08cr236-MHT (WO). (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120327923
Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2012
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Following the passage of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111-220, and the United States Sentencing Commission's issuance of retroactive sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine cases, this court established a Retroactivity Screening Panel to determine whether a defendant might be eligible for a reduction of sentence. Upon consideration of the Retroactivity Screening Panel, entered this date, and after and independent and de novo revi
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Following the passage of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111-220, and the United States Sentencing Commission's issuance of retroactive sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine cases, this court established a Retroactivity Screening Panel to determine whether a defendant might be eligible for a reduction of sentence. Upon consideration of the Retroactivity Screening Panel, entered this date, and after and independent and de novo revie..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Following the passage of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, Pub. L. 111-220, and the United States Sentencing Commission's issuance of retroactive sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine cases, this court established a Retroactivity Screening Panel to determine whether a defendant might be eligible for a reduction of sentence. Upon consideration of the Retroactivity Screening Panel, entered this date, and after and independent and de novo review of the record, it is ORDERED that defendant Alfred Bernard Jones should not receive a reduction in sentence pursuant to the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010.
Source: Leagle
