STANFORD v. CULBRETH, 1:11cv956-MHT (WO). (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120622f16
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2012
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting, among others, claims of excessive force and unlawful seizure. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted. An ap
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting, among others, claims of excessive force and unlawful seizure. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted. An app..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff filed this lawsuit asserting, among others, claims of excessive force and unlawful seizure. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that plaintiff's case be dismissed. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
