VARGAS v. U.S., 2:09-CV-766-WKW. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20120725a91
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. On June 29, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 45) regarding Petitioner Vargas's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Docs. # 1 & 35). No timely objections have been filed. Based upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. On June 29, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 45) regarding Petitioner Vargas's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Docs. # 1 & 35). No timely objections have been filed. Based upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 4..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
On June 29, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 45) regarding Petitioner Vargas's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Docs. # 1 & 35). No timely objections have been filed. Based upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon CONSIDERATION of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 45) is ADOPTED;
2. Petitioner's § 2255 motion is DENIED because the claims therein entitle him to no relief; and
3. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
An appropriate final judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
