McLEOD v. HARRELSON, 2:91cv02-MHT. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20130529b41
Visitors: 12
Filed: May 28, 2013
Latest Update: May 28, 2013
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Petitioner Jackie McLoed's motions for relief under Rule 60(b)(4) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. Nos. 72 and 74) are denied because they were not filed within a reasonable time pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(c)(1) and because the claims therein entitle petitioner McLeod to no relief. (2) To the extent peti
Summary: ORDER MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Petitioner Jackie McLoed's motions for relief under Rule 60(b)(4) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. Nos. 72 and 74) are denied because they were not filed within a reasonable time pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(c)(1) and because the claims therein entitle petitioner McLeod to no relief. (2) To the extent petit..
More
ORDER
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:
(1) Petitioner Jackie McLoed's motions for relief under Rule 60(b)(4) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. Nos. 72 and 74) are denied because they were not filed within a reasonable time pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(c)(1) and because the claims therein entitle petitioner McLeod to no relief.
(2) To the extent petitioner McLeod presents claims attacking his state convictions, his instant motion (Doc. No. 74) constitutes a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition that is dismissed in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), because he has failed to obtain the requisite order from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals authorizing this court to consider his successive habeas application.
Source: Leagle
