MADISON v. PEASANT, 2:10-CV-675-WKW. (2013)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20130611603
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2013
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. On May 14, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #18) regarding Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint. No timely objections have been filed. Based upon independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment contained withi
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. On May 14, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #18) regarding Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint. No timely objections have been filed. Based upon independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18) is ADOPTED; 2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment contained within..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
On May 14, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #18) regarding Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. No timely objections have been filed. Based upon independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #18) is ADOPTED;
2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment contained within their special report (Doc. #8) is GRANTED;
3. Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants.
A separate judgment shall issue.
Source: Leagle
