CAREY v. RUFFIN, 2:14-cv-145-MEF WO. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140502b32
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 01, 2014
Latest Update: May 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On April 10, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #9) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. That the plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. On April 10, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #9) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. That the plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without ..
More
ORDER
MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.
On April 10, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #9) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. That the plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
3. No costs are taxed herein.
Source: Leagle