LIETZE v. CITY OF MONTGOMERY, 2:13cv849-MHT (WO). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140509686
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 08, 2014
Latest Update: May 08, 2014
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff (a frequent litigator in this court) filed this lawsuit alleging, among other things, that police improperly stopped and talked to him. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's case should be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court
Summary: OPINION MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, plaintiff (a frequent litigator in this court) filed this lawsuit alleging, among other things, that police improperly stopped and talked to him. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's case should be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court ..
More
OPINION
MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, plaintiff (a frequent litigator in this court) filed this lawsuit alleging, among other things, that police improperly stopped and talked to him. This lawsuit is now before the court on the recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge that defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's case should be granted. There are no objections to the recommendation. After an independent and de novo review of the record, the court concludes that the magistrate judge's recommendation should be adopted.
An appropriate judgment will be entered.
Source: Leagle
