SWEENEY v. DANIELS, 2:12-cv-1039-TMH (WO). (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140519903
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 16, 2014
Latest Update: May 16, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The petitioner's objection (Doc. #18) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on January 7, 2014 is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17) filed on December 20, 2013 is adopted; 3. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). 4. The costs of this
Summary: ORDER MARK E. FULLER, District Judge. After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1. The petitioner's objection (Doc. #18) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on January 7, 2014 is overruled; 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17) filed on December 20, 2013 is adopted; 3. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(d). 4. The costs of this ..
More
ORDER
MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.
After an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that:
1. The petitioner's objection (Doc. #18) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed on January 7, 2014 is overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17) filed on December 20, 2013 is adopted;
3. The petition for habeas corpus relief is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
4. The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the petitioner.
Source: Leagle
