Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RIGGINS v. BATES, 2:11-CV-422-WKW[WO]. (2014)

Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama Number: infdco20140627826 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 80) and Plaintiff's timely filed objection (Doc. # 85). Based upon the court's independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, 28 U.S.C. 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. # 80) is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment (Docs. # 60
More

ORDER

W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.

Before the court are the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 80) and Plaintiff's timely filed objection (Doc. # 85). Based upon the court's independent and de novo review of those portions of the Recommendation to which objection is made, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), it is ORDERED that the objection is OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. # 80) is ADOPTED, that Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment (Docs. # 60, 74) is DENIED, and that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 11) is GRANTED.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer