LISENBY v. BLUE, 2:12-CV-375-TMH. (2014)
Court: District Court, M.D. Alabama
Number: infdco20140729639
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. On June 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 35.) Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and that: 1. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants (Docs. # 25, 26) is GRANTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED
Summary: ORDER W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge. On June 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 35.) Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and that: 1. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants (Docs. # 25, 26) is GRANTED; 2. This case is DISMISSED w..
More
ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief District Judge.
On June 2, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 35.) Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and that:
1. The motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants (Docs. # 25, 26) is GRANTED;
2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
3. The costs of this proceeding are TAXED against Plaintiff for which execution may issue.
Source: Leagle